Sign up to receive Alan's newsletter by email.

Speaking engagements

  • Invite Alan Korwin to speak at your event! Thought-provoking, entertaining, freedom-oriented topics -- your guests will thank you for the excitement -- long after the applause ends!

Books

Americans Agree on 15 Gun Policies - Not

Lamestream Report Based on Nonsense

Reported as if Credible, Without Real Basis

The lamestream media told you:

Science News -- Erika Engelhaupt -- "Despite a public debate that grows more fractious with every school shooting, Americans actually agree on gun policy to a surprising extent. According to a survey of more than 2,100 people, majorities of both gun owners and nonowners support 15 potential gun restrictions or regulations, researchers report online May 17 in the American Journal of Public Health."

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Science News, a once respectable digest of important developments in scientific discovery, has abandoned even the pretense of neutrality or science, with a new report on firearms based solely on the nation’s leading gun-control advocates. “Americans Agree on 15 Gun Policies” cites David Hemenway, described as “an expert on violence prevention who was not involved in the study.” This individual is widely recognized as one of the leading anti-gun-rights proponents in the nation, supported and quoted by gun-control groups, whose work finds no redeeming values to gun ownership.

The study itself comes from the John Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, an agenda-driven organization created in 1995 and funded primarily with a $50 million endowment from Michael Bloomberg (and joined by other left-leaning funders) for the expressed purpose of developing gun-control policy positions. Asking this source for data, and Hemenway to provide credibility is like asking the Flat Earth Society for maps.

The Hopkins Center, since its creation, has issued a steady flood of papers discovering a single finding -- guns are bad, cause harm, serve no valid purpose, and should be regulated, banned, controlled, and gun owners are basically a detriment to society. No valuable purpose to firearms or their role in society appears in any output from the Center, which dominates page after page in Google searches. Its single-minded results alone should prompt any reasonable scientist to question its findings, since firearms are clearly involved in peace-keeping internationally, stopping crime domestically, saving lives, and even if only in police hands, they serve a valuable civic function. Three consecutive years of credible research from the federal Centers for Disease Control shows private firearms prevent 2.5 million crimes annually.

While the Science News report claims gun owners and non-owners alike overwhelmingly support background checks, the actual survey was not described. As readers of Page Nine are aware, background checks have no effect on the main areas of mass murder that motivate the ill-informed public to seek them -- sociopathic children who seek to mass murder their classmates, Muslim jihadis waging war on Americans, inner-city gangs fully armed and committing 6,000 unsolved murders annually after two decades of background checks, and the recording of 12 million innocent Americans names yearly, in the false name of stopping crime.

Perhaps worst is the little-known fact that, after vicious criminals are identified during checks, trying to buy guns at known locations with the FBI on the phone, and having provided their names and contact info on signed forms (which itself is felony perjury), they are simply sent away, with their money. Whether Americans actually agree on that, as Hemenway, the Hopkins Center and Science News report is true, was unclear at press time, like the other highly controversial facts about background checks.

Setting the denied persons free might not be too terribly bad, since the denials are conducted by low-level computer clerks sitting in offices in West Virginia. The checks remove fundamental constitutional rights people should have without trials, due process or representation, and according to expert Dr. John Lott, false positives in the system exceed 90%. That’s proven out by the almost total lack of convictions, or even court cases, for the supposed criminals denied their rights in stores, another point Americans might not agree upon in the high numbers Science News unequivocally declares. No effort to reach Science News was made, since they have been unresponsive in the past, and the story is so hopelessly prejudicial.

Editor Nancy Shute, writer Erika Engelhaupt and Science News are of course welcome to respond, answer any of the claims made in this article and provide any evidence refuting this piece, or run an article in their publication addressing these points, which would be standard in similar cases. According to leading experts, that will not occur.

Vote Fraud Documentation

Investors Business Daily reports 3.5 million more
registered voters than live American adults who can vote.
Census data study by Judicial Watch confirmed.

Nation Review crunches numbers, it's correct.

The lamestream media told you:

All evidence disproves Republican claims the nation suffers from any vote fraud. Efforts at voter ID are just secret efforts to disenfranchise voters, and make it harder for people of color and other marginalized groups to register and swing elections. Some people have no ID and so are prevented from registering to vote. Republicans are dishonest and can't win fairly, so they resort to registration tricks and other dirty tactics. Repeat this story ad infinitum and people will eventually believe it.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/u-s-has-3-5-million-more-registered-voters-than-live-adults-a-red-flag-for-electoral-fraud/

"According to a new study of U.S. Census data, America has more registered voters than actual live voters. "The data come from Judicial Watch's Election Integrity Project. The group looked at data from 2011 to 2015 produced by the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, along with data from the federal Election Assistance Commission.

"As reported by the National Review's Deroy Murdock, who did some numbers-crunching of his own, "some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America's adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud."

Excerpts:

"462 U.S. counties had a registration rate exceeding 100% of all eligible voters."

"California, for instance, has 11 counties with more registered voters than actual voters."

"Los Angeles County, whose more than 10 million people make it the nation's most populous county, had 12% more registered voters than live ones, some 707,475 votes. That's a huge number of possible votes in an election."

"As a Wikipedia list of close elections shows, since just 2000 there have been literally dozens of elections at the state, local and federal level decided by 100 votes or fewer."

The report suggests Hillary's popular vote lead in the 2016 election could have been a function of "ghost voters," registrations exceeding actual live people. Hillary lost the Electoral College vote by a 60% to 40% margin, 30 states to 20, an overwhelming upset rarely mentioned in the mass media, which prefers to harp on the popular vote difference.

It's the llegals: Forcing Kid Separations

They know kids can't go to adult prisons

1,700 arrive daily -- 50,000 per month -- was that clear to you?

"News" media brags "Arrests are down!"

For every arrest, at least one illegal sneaks in, maybe two, guards say

The lamestream media told you:

President Trump is tearing families apart at the border because he is evil and cruel. He could stop it if he wanted to but he likes it this way. He thinks this will stop immigration. He is a xenophobe (hates foreigners) and a racist (undefined epithet) and has ordered children to be separated from their families. When he says the media is among America's worst enemies he is attacking us, righteous people doing our jobs, instead of fixing a severe problem for which he is solely responsible.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Let me put this in a context you can understand -- an airport -- because so few people know what it's like to cross a border near a shift-hole like Nogales or other stinking southern desert border towns, across miles of blazing empty desert.

If you attempt to sneak past the TSA agents at a legitimate gate where there is a right way in and guards and cameras and the works, you're going to be arrested and you know it.

So you don't do that, you use the regular path. If you have a child with you, the child will not be put into the same prison cell you will end up in. That would be sick and insane. And illegal. It turns out the ACLU screams bloody murder when precious little children are thrown into the same prison cells with miscreants and adult invaders after they sneak into America.

When you have 50,000 people sneaking in illegally every month -- every month -- like we do here (illegal immigration has dropped, hooray!) -- the people doing this create a massive problem for our nation. The so-called "news" media has failed to make this clear to you.

If it's not your kid, who knows?



The "news" media are proudly proclaiming that arrests are DOWN to only 50,000 per month (600,000 per year) and FAILING to mention that for every arrest, one illegally sneaks in successfully. People here are encouraging people outside to do this -- come to our borders and demand entry, with their babies, children and teenagers. It doesn't even have to be your baby or child -- who's to know?

Everyone knows ahead of time the kids can't go to the same prisons their parents will. Everyone knows if you attempt to break into America (or virtually any sovereign nation) you ought to be arrested and prosecuted. Everyone south of us knew Obama was just letting people all flood in. Everyone except you, the "news" consuming public. Though you ought to know.

That's the logic and principle of it. If you want the math and details, check with Ben Stein. He has it spelled out. (1997 Flores case in the 9th Circuit controls accompanied and unaccompanied children, legal and illegal, in country more than 20 days, choosing deportation or not, controlled by law, exactly the same as under Obama, it's complicated. The real issue isn't separation, it's deportation, required by law. 50,000 per month.) That's about 1,700 every day sneaking in, and another 1,7000 caught and arrested.

We Need More Gun Laws -- say what?

The lamestream media told you:

Surviving victims of the Parkland mass murders went on a 20-state 75-city summer bus tour they arranged to promote gun-safety measures that will stop future school massacres. They are seeking new common-sense gun laws against a Congress that has refused to act because the evil NRA has bought and sold its members. What the adults have been unable to achieve the kids may have a chance at getting done, at last. Yes, we keep running this story.

The common-sense measures the children are supporting include increased universal background checks, a ban on assault weapons and removal of dangerous guns from our streets. The tour includes a voter-registration drive for youngsters who will be turning or are 18 years of age.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

America has 94,000+ words of gun law at the federal level. Do the children know that? It's rhetorical. They do not. Every imaginable criminal act is already outlawed. New proposed laws only outlaw legal behavior, except -- No federal crimes (yet) for officials who infringe.

Gun laws don't cause crime (at least not directly).

Gun laws don't stop crime (or might be a slight deterrent to the weak).

Gun laws provide a way to gauge and punish criminals after they commit crimes. Every crime imaginable is already illegal. New gun laws, which are only proposed by democrats for reasons that are unclear, affect rights Americans have and do not address criminals in any new way. That's because all criminal activity with guns is already illegal, but I repeat myself.

If you want to see and understand the gun laws already in place across the nation, you get and read this, it has them all. Politicians don't know it. The public doesn't know it. Most judges don't know it.

You should know it:


GUN LAWS OF AMERICA

by Alan Korwin with Attorney Michael P. Anthony
$19.95
add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif
 
Ask for an autograph on the order form.
--
 


The complex multi-city multi-state anti-gun-rights bus tour for the new Parkland political activist advocates has been staged and orchestrated by the nation's leading anti-Second Amendment political operatives, and funded by dark money forces who are remaining completely out of the public eye. The idea the kids did this themselves is as false as almost everything else about this micro-managed event.

Sociopathic children who want to mass murder their classmates are unaffected by gun laws. They don't care about their classmates or gun laws, they care about the psychotropic drugs most of them are on, a fact suppressed by mass media, but available to researchers and you if you look.

Even if "law" required every gun in America to be under lock and key, an infringement banned by the Constitution that would make guns worthless for their righteous and intended use, guns would remain widely available -- as they are to countless criminals who cannot have them at all. Kids get drugs, what makes you think they won't be able to get guns -- especially if they are intent on committing murder.

To be effective in combating the misinformation and anti-rights attacks citizens face from children on a bus tour, mass media that reports total distortion on gun issues, and neighbors and friends whose understanding is lower than their shoe size, read in plain English what our gun laws are:


GUN LAWS OF AMERICA

by Alan Korwin with Attorney Michael P. Anthony
$19.95
add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

Available on Kindle!
HERE Only $9.95 
Unabridged!

WHOLESALE DISCOUNTS!
List Price $19.95 each, your wholesale cost $11.97 each, minimum order is 6 ($71.82) 
add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif


Knowledge is power.
Oh yeah?
Click this:
http://www.gunlaws.com

Why Are Kids Killing Kids?

The lamestream media told you:

We need common-sense gun laws to stop the mass murders we are seeing across this great country. If only we had more gun laws. The big bully NRA is stopping Congress from doing the right thing. That's the problem. Imagine how much peace we would have if only we could get these weapons-of-war off our streets, with more laws. Maybe these kids on the march now, completely self-motivated, will finally come up with an answer.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Laws don't stop criminals. Laws describe punishment after criminals act. This simple truth is lost on many people who are uneducated, or cannot think straight, even after they're educated. More laws don't change these facts.

The children's March for our Lives, including the 20-state, 75-city tour supposedly set up by themselves as a summer jaunt, is heralded as a solution. For reasons that were unexplained at press time, they offer the same solutions the gun-control advocates have offered for decades -- more background checks, bans and confiscations of scary black guns, a new ban on bump stocks (a plastic item used in one unresolved crime in Sin City), and a proposed ban on additional resource officers (armed police) in schools. Also, assaults on the NRA and discrimination against anyone having anything to do with the NRA.

The NRA is the largest gun-safety organization on the planet. They are the ones who promote the gun-safety rules, teach the gun-safety trainers, formulate the policies that lead to decreases in firearm accidents.

The people who work there want their kids protected at school as much as you or anyone else. The idea that mass media could propose such a preposterous lie ("the NRA wants kids dead!" is stunning, shows the insanity of the left. It doesn't even make sense. The NRA stands stalwart against anti-rights activists who want to deny the Bill of Rights. What's wrong with that is the people who want the Bill of Rights abolished, not its defense.

According to one leading expert, kids are killing each other because society is teaching them not only to do so but how to do so. Every fiber of pop culture is filled with that message. Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, who has taught our armed forces to get over their inhibitions about killing sees it, and has documented it, in his amazing book,"Stop Teaching Our Kids to Kill." This book will shock you. You may not be strong enough to read it.


STOP TEACHING OUR KIDS TO KILL
 
By Lt. Col. Dave Grossman and Gloria DeGaetano 240 p. #ST $15

add_to_cart.gif  view_cart.gif

 


It's not just fun and games when Hollywood's super stars run around machine-gunning each other with glee, blowing each other's brains out at close range in full color with splat effects, or doing that bullet-death-dance they do.

Kids learn from this. There is no moral component to mass murder any longer. It's right there on the screen. The methods and tactics for killing and getting away are taught in movies, video games and especially, on TV every night. You switch channels and every click brings another gun, another murder, more death and no consequence. This has a consequence.

Grossman documents this with medical-, psychological- and combat-accurate references page after page. You will learn from this book. You will be outraged. You will have the verbal ammunition you need to fight back. He even provides phone numbers. You want to stop our kids from killing each other? Get a few of these and give them to your liberal friends who think guns are the problem. What a laugh that is.

China's Secret War Against America

The lamestream media told you:

Nothing significant. Our big trading partner is growing at leaps and bounds. Trump and China's leader have held meetings and talks. China's middle class is growing. China has an air pollution problem. Their new "national bird" is the construction crane, ha ha. China is North Korea's main sponsor, big deal, they're bad but China is our friend. Even though China supplies almost everything to North Korea and could stop them cold if they wanted to. Hey, isn't stuff going on with North Korea now after Trump's meeting?

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

"The Chinese Communist Party has for decades waged a quiet war against the United States, mobilizing all elements of its society and targeting the institutions and foundations of the American system. The strategies pull from the Soviet-era practices and are part of the Chinese regime's system of 'unrestricted warfare,' which promotes the idea of war without morals.

"The Epoch Times* lays out the various strategies used in this hidden war in a new infographic and reveals the use of each strategy. Among the more than 40 strategies explained are culture warfare to break the moral fabric of a society, cyberwarfare as a tool to achieve various goals, economic warfare to rob and destroy a country's economy, and psychological warfare to alter he way people interpret information."

*The Epoch Times is an English language newspaper, published in California, by journalists with a different and inner view of China, covering subjects that American media won't go near. See the full infographic and be horrified: https://www.theepochtimes.com/infographic-chinas-secret-war-against-america_2458236.html. Accuracy of reporting on our friends the communist Chinese is almost as accurate as mass media reporting on anything concerning firearms.

 

Guns Are A Public Health BENEFIT

CDC Continues to be banned from interference

For good reason

The lamestream media told you:

The corrupt and detestable Republicans keep blocking funds for the federal government to do valuable research into gun violence and prevention of gun crime. This has been going on for decades.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

What are the chances the CDC, banned for decades from doing gun research, because it’s work is little more than gun-control propaganda, would ever come up with a result like the headline on this article? Guns are indeed a public health benefit. Guns are why America is still free.

It turns out that psychopathology, schizophrenia, psychosis, and the whole host of certifiable mental states that lead to violent crime and outbursts of insanity, leading to death and destruction, can be cured by “lead poisoning” -- criminals getting shot by armed citizens. Because guns stop crime and keep people safe, it is scientifically proven that gun ownership has a public health benefit. Doctors and researches might argue over the size of the benefit, or the comparative value of the benefit, but it is definitely there.

The CDC has never come close to recognizing any benefit from the “germs of guns” or the "disease" of gun ownership. It’s no wonder they are banned from inserting their known bias into the field, and calling it research. Only democrats campaign for re-injecting their bad medicine into the field. For them, it’s an alternate avenue of attack on fundamental civil rights, by groups with no legitimate value for American jurisprudence, looking for new ways to take away your guns, something they swear they will not do.

You're the Loser -- or Winner

The lamestream media told you:

The blue wave is going to take over the government. Once democrats control the House they plan to impeach the president. Nothing will stop them. We told you so. They'll eliminate the filibuster rule the republicans idiotically maintain because they have principles. Dems don't. Just watch. The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

ATTENTION:

If you belong to a shooting club, a hunt club, a wildlife club, Ducks Unlimited, Western Turkey something, Single Action Shooting Sports, Three Gun whatever, IPSC, the alphabet our-side soup --

and you’re not registered to vote, or you don’t vote,

YOU PERSONALLY will be responsible for everyone else losing their right to keep and bear arms.

Left-wing billionaires are doing everything they can to rob you of your rights.

To make sure their armed servants have guns, to protect them, and you have nothing.

The bill to ban the AR-15, that school kids think they want, bans anything with a magazine and a grip. It's true. They don't know that. Maybe you don't either.

Elections matter. You matter -- unless you don’t vote.
I don’t know how to be more clear.

You are already on the government list -- because you get mail.

You have a phone, a TV with reception -- "they" know who you are.

Figure out how to register, where to vote, and vote.

You have four months.

You’ve been warned. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.

Infringement Is Illegal

The lamestream media told you:

We must ban guns. Especially the AR-15. And guns with magazines. And repeal the Second Amendment. No one needs a gun. There are so many stories in the so-called "news" calling for gun bans it is pointless to point to any particular ones. The journalism ethic that requires covering all sides of a story is completely abandoned, no where to be found. All the good guns do, all the lives saved and crimes prevented, are suppressed. When a mass murderer was shot dead outside a diner in Ohio the other day, reporters flocked to the scene after hearing of people shot, then fled when they learned the criminal had been shot by a permit holder.

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Calls to outlaw guns, gun possession, accessories and similar wild-eyed notions now percolating through a portion of our youth and culture are... illegal.

So called “news” media, involved in whipping up the public and unsuspecting youngsters into a frenzy to ban gun types, gun parts, all guns, and places where people can have guns for all legal purposes -- like defense against murderers -- are an affront to our society and our Constitution. When did teachers lose their right to keep and bear arms exactly? The guarantees of The U.S. Bill of Rights can just be... lost?

Unless you decide to give up on the rule of law, and simply enact anything by mob rule, guns can’t simply be banned, as television is campaigning for. People could begin a new country based on utopian socialist rule with no leadership, no charter, and the will of the people simply expressed day-to-day by vote, that’s conceivable. But America cannot legitimately ban guns already in the public’s hands by passing laws, to appease loud children.

We get that the kids are scared, and should be, they’ve been let down. That doesn’t erase the rule of law.

If stopping crazed, psychotic mass murderers who take it on themselves to spree murder their classmates is the goal, that’s a good goal.

Loud youngsters who think disarming the public will somehow accomplish that goal are not mature enough to understand that first, -- it won’t work, and second, the adults egging them on in the media and politics are manipulative SOBs worse than their worst parents.

Those adults are using what amounts to a national tantrum to accomplish the adults’ goal -- not the children’s goal. The so-called “news” media has disguised or totally hidden this revealing truth. Journalists have become virtually as much an enemy of the nation’s health as the murderers themselves. That’s a hard thing to say, as a journalist myself.

Here’s a secret. Everyone wants to stop sociopathic students from murdering their classmates at school. It shouldn’t be a secret. The hated NRA wants to stop that. Do you really think they’re devils who want their own kids at that kind of risk? If you do, you’ve been sold a bill of goods. Remember the secret -- Everyone wants to stop sociopathic students from murdering their classmates at school.

Here’s the bottom line. Banning a firearm a person already owns is infringement, simply by definition. Doing that is banned in America, it’s why we’re the linchpin of freedom on the planet. It’s why oppressed masses flock here, and always have, though schools no longer teach this. They used to, when America was at its peak.

Attempting to take such a firearm away -- government confiscation of the public’s guns is aggravated infringement, felony-level criminal activity. It is exactly what government cannot legitimately do. It’s where peaceful rule of law ends and tyranny begins: gun-taking. Gun-taking kindles revolts, around the world, and if it goes too far, it could happen here. Disarming the innocent doesn’t set well with the innocent. The reverse is true too -- you can’t arm slaves and expect them to remain slaves.

State by state, we are going to see an effort to put aggravated infringement into statute so offending officials can be charged and imprisoned if they attempt to infringe on this fundamental constitutional right. Banning guns is on the same par as banning gays, blacks, speech, Bibles -- you just can’t do that here.

It doesn’t matter how many votes you can manipulate or cajole with phony logic. “Majority rules, minority protected,” you remember that, right? It means you can’t strip the Bill of Rights with a legislative vote.

People who do so or attempt to do so need to be subject to defined penalties. Like any other civil and human rights violation. We actually have 18 USC §241, and 18 USC §242 for this, they just need some backup, and enforcement (q.v., denial of constitutional or statutory rights is a crime). Read those short, crystalline statutes.

The noise level is rising to a dangerous pitch. Attempting to disarm the public is what has, throughout history, led to either revolution or genocide. Americans want neither. The loud children want neither either, they just don’t know it. They know not what they do, and their handlers are keeping them quietly in the dark.

The Andersons and Wolves are incomprehensibly keeping them ignorant, and maybe they are themselves. I’m reluctant to join my colleagues who see it for an evil agenda, and the markings could easily be read that way. At the least the mass media culprits should lose their licenses to broadcast. Oh, that’s right—they are unlicensed operators.

Banning guns already in the public’s hands is infringement. Attempting to take an infringed item is aggravated infringement. Attempting to take an infringed item is where chilling phrases like, “Bullets first!” and “From my cold dead fingers!” arise. This country does not want to go there. Someone tell the kids.

RAINBOW CROSSWALKS INSULT EVERYONE

Gay Community Thinks Crosswalks Are Political Billboards

What color should Black Lives Matter get?

Dancing in the streets about to become a real safety hazard

The lamestream media told you:

"Phoenix values and embraces its LGBTQ brothers and sisters," mayor Stanton said in a news release. "Phoenix is committed to ensuring equal treatment and rights for everyone and showing our support because we know diversity makes us stronger."

The installation of the rainbow crosswalks in Phoenix were requested by the Phoenix Pride Community Foundation, one-n-ten, and Aunt Rita's Foundation after contacting the mayor's office. These groups have offered to cover the costs of materials, installation and ongoing maintenance for the rainbow-painted portions of the crosswalks that are not already maintained by the city, according to the news release.

http://www.azfamily.com/story/38036112/two-rainbow-crosswalks-approved-in-phoenix-by-mayor-stanton-city-council

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Painting crosswalks into rainbow colors for sexual politics crosses a bright red line. The gay community must not manipulate (in this case) the Phoenix City Council politicians under the dubious rubrics of "inclusion and diversity." Google informs us this now includes lesbians, bisexuals, transgenders, questioners, transsexuals, asexuals, reassigns, multi-genders, agenders, non-genders, genderqueers, genderfluids, and other recently identified sexually diverse people.

Changing something as basic as safety crosswalks for their personal political ambitions -- especially ones that arouse deep gut feelings, animosity and political discord in the community -- dishonors any respect for older fundamental rights. How many crosswalks will we have to repaint, in what colors, to represent Black Lives Matter, Blue Lives Matter, or even the Right to Free Speech -- which you can actually find in the Constitution? How long will this list become? Do we really want gun-rights advocates to get their shot at a crosswalk?

Rainbows make equal crosswalks unequal. Rainbows are magnificent acts of nature. Misappropriating them for political advantage on public roads are Intolerable Acts. It doesn’t matter who pays or how much pride a group has in its adopted color guard. Everyone pays when politicians allow such discrimination against everyone else. It is intolerant and non-inclusive.

The entire gender-confusion bollix is an artifice of the “left” -- a euphemism for socialism, which long ago determined destruction of the family unit was a superb solution for dissolving The American Way. The gay community has every right to live their lives in peace and harmony. This isn’t that. This is an aggressive assault. Brutal communist dictator Nikita Khrushchev said, “We will bury you.” He didn’t say how long it would take, or how they would accomplish the task.

The Federal Register in 1963 recorded 45 stated goals of communism that included a terrifying list of values such as:

discrediting the family as an institution, promoting promiscuity, pornography, obscenity, degeneracy, easy divorce, the negative influence of parents, promoting ugliness, meaningless forms as art, and the idea that such things are normal, natural and healthy.

You can decide for yourself whether any of that is valid, I’m not judging so don’t shoot this messenger. I’m just noticing we’ve arrived.

Khrushchev’s late advocate Saul Alinsky, a widely recognized guiding light for leading leftists Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, is now influencing socialists in America with projects like taking over crosswalks. They must be stopped before they nail the coffin shut on The American Way. It’s not about the rainbows, intolerance and phony inclusion they pitch. It’s about God, family and pure American values first, which they denigrate.

When the term “family values” first hit the scene writ large around 1990, mass-media geniuses screamed “What is that,” as if they didn’t know. Maybe they didn’t, which would be terrifying -- bad enough to revoke their licenses -- except they’re unlicensed operators.

Americans know implicitly what family values are. They are what made this nation the shining beacon of freedom that attracts people to our land. Those values must be protected against the vicious assaults we’re experiencing now at every black-and-white line in the road.

The state newspaper, which promoted the one-sided rainbow program widely, refused to publish this article.

Read what people are saying about Page Nine, or tell Alan yourself.

See the archives below, or click through to an index of Page Nine posts at Gunlaws.com

About the Author

  • Freelance writer Alan Korwin is a founder and past president of the Arizona Book Publishing Association. With his wife Cheryl he operates Bloomfield Press, the largest producer and distributor of gun-law books in the country. Here writing as "The Uninvited Ombudsman," Alan covers the day's stories as they ought to read. Read more.

Recent Comments

Read the last 100 comments on one handy page here!