Sign up to receive Alan's newsletter by email.

Speaking engagements

  • Invite Alan Korwin to speak at your event! Thought-provoking, entertaining, freedom-oriented topics -- your guests will thank you for the excitement -- long after the applause ends!

Books

JPFO Gun Confiscation Clock Loses 2 Minutes

Democrats’ Bills HR8 and HR1446 Threaten Freedom

JPFO Gun Confiscation Clock Loses 2 Minutes

Pair of unconstitutional bills threaten all Americans

 

So-called “gun control” isn’t crime control

Usual scheme to use maniacs to induce disarming public is perverse

Ignoring ban on infringement should be grounds for removal from office

 

Unnamed

 

The JPFO Gun Confiscation Clock has moved two minutes closer to midnight, as Democrats vote on a pair of bills that attack citizens but ignore criminals. At nine minutes to midnight, rights Americans have always had and enjoyed are rapidly shrinking, with confiscations planned and written into bills waiting in the wings. 

“Democrats and the hard-core leftists pushing them have no understanding or respect for the Constitution and its safeguard limits on legislative actions,” said Alan Gottlieb, CEO and Board Chairman of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, jpfo.org. “They act as if they are under no constraint, and with the power they now wield, they pose a direct threat to our Republic and way of life,” he said.

 “Forcing decent Americans to wait for increasingly long times to purchase legal property will not affect armed criminals, who are the real problem,” added Alan Korwin, a widely published author and consultant to JPFO. “Criminals remain armed and are ignored by these bills, while regular people are infringed, making matters worse,” he observed. First-time criminals looking to get arms at retail will be forced to shop elsewhere—the black market—which they do already. Armed criminals are ignored by these illegal federal infringements. JPFO believes if any action is needed it should encourage finding and removing hardened armed criminals from society, not more paperwork for the bureaucracy.

Isn’t Voting More Dangerous Than Guns?

Democrats and Republicans Miss This Answer:

Isn’t Voting More Dangerous Than Guns?

Electing the wrong people can kill millions

 

Giving the vote to people who aren’t adult citizens compromises everything.

A person who is free to vote MUST have
all other rights intact.

 

Democrats and “Progressive-Leftists”—a synonym for socialists and now virtually the same thing, seek to expand the U.S. electorate to people who traditionally cannot bear arms, or vote. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, jpfo.org, understands this is a terrible idea that can literally destroy the nation. Only qualified adult U.S. citizens can legally vote, or bear arms. 

“All the Bill of Rights for all citizens,” has been a benchmark of this organization since our Founder Aaron Zelman first voiced those words decades ago. There is a reason felons and prisoners in prisons cannot vote. There is a reason people in the country illegally cannot vote. The Democrats’ plans to provide the vote to these people, expressed in the pending bill HR1, defeats the balances of power our Republic must preserve. Letting 16-year-old children vote, before they are mature, knowledgeable, or still under the influence of biased educators in lower grades, is only a good idea if you seek to seize power and rule the country as a monolith. 

Owning and possessing a firearm, or many, is a stark undeniable symbol of freedom. A person qualified to vote MUST be free to exercise that and all the freedoms of The U.S. Constitution. Granting “partial freedom” or “partial citizenship” is a truly corrupt political practice. If you don’t trust a felon enough with the right to arms, you certainly can’t trust that person with the right to vote. Voting is far more dangerous. It can send armies of warriors overseas and domestically to engage in slaughter. Do 16-year-old children understand this? Do you?

Dems Introduced Total Gun Bans

HR 127 Isn't enacted yet

Long List of Common Guns Banned

Possessing .50 Cal Ammo To Be Outlawed Immediately

Every Gun You Now Own Will Require Federal License

Full description and storage location must be provided for each one

Listing errors would be major offenses, simply relocating a gun would be illegal

License Requires Psych Test—of your family too

The Ban on a Federal Gun Registry Is Repealed

Registry Contents Accessible to the Public, and Anyone

No Firearm Possession by Anyone Under 18

No Wiggle Room, No Appeals

Penalties from $75,000 and 15 Years

Attorney General Gets All Powers

Entire bill described in Plain English below

Read the bill for yourself:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/127/text

----::::----

 
Democrats introduce totally unconstitutional
gun bill
HR 127
 
Shows zero concern for legality, delegated powers, Bill of Rights
 
Has no focus on crime or criminal activity, grants huge new powers to government
 
New "offenses" require no wrongdoing, just routine property ownership
 
Failure to buy their $800 insurance policy is a crime
 
Named after Pakistani Muslim exchange student victim of school mass murderer
 
Many requirements will be mandated later by an appointed Attorney General
 
Sheila Jackson Lee cites Art. I, Sec. 8, as authority for her bill
 
I wish I could say I was making this up, it is so bizarre
 
Complete details below. Be sure to sit down.
 
----::::----
 

HR 127 Main Sponsor, Sheila Jackson Lee
 
I am describing the bill in plain English terms, which requires some ease on the grammar, but no substantive changes. (e.g., "Wherefore art thou Romeo" becomes "Where are you Romeo" etc.)
 
USC Section § 923 Licensing of Firearm and Ammunition Possession; Registration of Firearms
The Attorney General (AG) working through the BATFE, shall establish a system for licensing and registering all firearms and ammo in private hands.
 
This must include make, model number, serial number, owner, date acquired and where the firearm is or will be stored.
 

Continue reading "Dems Introduced Total Gun Bans" »

Joe Biden's Plan for Everyone's Guns

The Democrat's text for effectively ending the Second Amendment, HR 5717.

I’m starting with Parts One and Two below (called Title I and II, it goes on to Title X, or Ten).

It is complete federal discretion over firearms freedom.

“Shall not be infringed” may as well be erased from The U.S. Bill of Rights.

The Republicans who are standing by silently deserve to be removed.

Mass media, leaving you uninformed, are indeed among the greatest enemies our nation faces.

This is total infringement from its opening line:

“It shall be unlawful for any individual who is not licensed under this section to knowingly purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition.”

You can’t have or get guns, not even the ones you already own, without federal permission.

If democrats sweep the election, they have already written this, introduced it, just need majorities to enact it.

"But the Supreme Court would overturn that!" you shout.

And Democrats have promised to overrun the Supreme Court.

The conditions for granting gun permission are literally whatever the leadership says it should be. Including determining if you are fit, by their standards.

That’s what Biden and his gang’s new law (in plain English, below) will require when enacted. Compare that to: the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. You can’t. The “officials” have absolutely no legitimately delegated power or authority to do what their bill says. So how is it they can even propose such a thing? Ask how they can propose an ineligible person for the job. They know they will not get shot for proposing it—the arms you keep are a nullity. The opposition party is AWOL (Republicans), without warrants they have earned for their arrest, for dereliction of duty.

Continue reading "Joe Biden's Plan for Everyone's Guns" »

"Just Shoot 'Em in the Leg!"

Joe Biden recommends committing armed felony. But it doesn’t matter, the nation is so polarized.

Dangerous, felony gun advice goes nationwide—
“Just shoot him in the leg!”
JPFO condemns Joe Biden’s illegal dangerous advice.

What may be worse, mess media failed to inform the public—
Don’t they know it’s illegal to shoot to wound people?

Joe Biden—and mass media—apparently need better understanding here: This is the same man who suggested firing a shotgun blast through a closed door. The mandatory gun safety rule is: “Know your target before squeezing the trigger.”

Although Joe Biden demonstrated a nearly complete lack of knowledge about firearms law, firearms safety, self defense and crime-prevention tactics, he has never been questioned on these subjects by mass media. The words “Second Amendment” get invoked periodically, followed by familiar wedge-issue talking points, and substantive detail never emerges. The paucity of understanding exhibited in these displays, not just “gaffes” that can be written off with chuckles, but careless ignorance and apparent willingness to act upon it, should alarm you. Based on the few statements he has made, it is not unfair to speculate that Joe Biden would be unsafe at a shooting range with a cocked pistol fully loaded with live ammo, and a paper target downrange. Yes, the very thought put a chill through us too.

Joe Biden suggested committing felonies with firearms to a national audience. JPFO recommends contacting their spokesperson and firearms expert Charles Heller (jpfo.org) to explain why those are both dangerous felonies, and better ways to handle similar situations. Mr. Biden’s encouragement to make noise shooting a gun up into the air is a specific criminal act. In Arizona it's called Shannon's law.

“While it’s legal to use deadly force to defend yourself in the most dire circumstance, it’s never legal to intentionally wound someone. If you truly believe your life is at immediate risk, the last thing you want to attempt is the most difficult shot known—hitting a moving human limb in the fractions of a second where such a shot could be legally fired at a killer assaulting you. Given his statements, I suspect Joe Biden couldn’t even recite the basic three gun safety rules.”

–Alan Korwin, Co-Author, Supreme Court Gun Cases

Although websites were awash in chastising Joe for his foolishness, no one confronted the candidate with his unwise advice. For all we can tell, he still thinks shooting the legs out from under villains is a strategy. What sort of “news” media doesn’t bring this up? This is bigger than the Second Amendment, which is merely a concept and words. This is iron and guns for Pete's sake! Will somebody speak to the man? Say what, he’s holed up at home?

The Real Threat to Your Guns Is Not Just Rust and Politicians

The biggest threat to your fundamental right – your right to keep and bear arms – may not be what you’ve always feared. It may not be new laws. The risk may not even be from the two main political parties, though they both need constant watching, as Thomas Jefferson and the Founding Fathers warned.

No, the threat may be coming from something we were keenly alerted to back in the 1950s and 1960s, which we’ve grown inured to, bored with, discarded onto history’s trash heap. We may have forgotten it as a guns-and-ammo threat, but it’s still there. As alive as ever, active as ever, working its nefarious magic, seeking to take every gun you own, every round of ammunition you possess, either by direct force or through subversive covert action. That enemy is our old friendly villain, Marxism and communism, now in control of fully one third of the world’s population and making inroads here. Mass media, infected with that scourge, is not alerting us. They hide it, disguise it, aiding and abetting a mortal enemy of our Republic.

Thomas Jefferson warned, “Be eternally vigilant” to preserve freedom. He could never have imagined an enemy like Karl Marx. The rioting, looting, arson and upheaval we have witnessed on our televisions every night, is being run by dedicated Marxists with announced plans, signage, upraised fists. They make no secret of it. Class warfare. Call it “racism” if you want, but that’s not it, we are as free from racism as any nation you can name, which is why American immigration is basically a one-way street – inbound. No one is breaking into Cuba, China, Africa or lining roadways escaping here. These nightly mobs have communist influences and international provocateurs at their heart. Leaving you armed to resist is not their plan.

Continue reading "The Real Threat to Your Guns Is Not Just Rust and Politicians" »

Joe Biden's Plan for Everyone's Guns

The Democrat's text for effectively ending the Second Amendment, HR 5717

I’m starting with Parts One and Two below (called Title I and II, it goes on to Title X, or Ten).

It is complete federal discretion over firearms freedom.

“Shall not be infringed” may as well be erased from The U.S. Bill of Rights.

The Republicans who are standing by silently deserve to be removed.

Mass media, leaving you uninformed, are indeed among the greatest enemies our nation faces.

This is total infringement from its opening line:

“It shall be unlawful for any individual

who is not licensed under this section to knowingly

purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition.”

You can’t have or get guns, not even the ones you already own, without federal permission.

If democrats sweep the election, they have already written this, introduced it, just need majorities to enact it.

"But the Supreme Court would overturn that!" you shout.

And Democrats have promised to overrun the Supreme Court.

Continue reading "Joe Biden's Plan for Everyone's Guns" »

Democrats Gun Restriction Plan

 
No Need to Wait for Biden—
THE PLAN HAS BEEN ANNOUNCED
 
The plan is spelled out in plain English in The JPFO Bill of Rights Sentinel, Edition 20, now on press.
Join up to get a copy -- Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership, http://www.jpfo.org
 
"You don't have to be Jewish to support JPFO, you just have to love liberty."
 
It's the Judeo-Christian ethic. (That's what BLM wants to disavow and destroy.)
 
You can read the bill for yourself, it's mostly in English. Just read the first of its ten chapters, called "Titles." HR5717. Title I.  https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5717/text Or Title V, with the gun-ban part. The Table of Contents there is all live links.
 
 
And this part here isn't in the bill.. it's on Joe Biden's website. His anti-gun plan is straight out of the Bloomberg/Brady/Griffin-Kelly/Soros anti-gun-rights playbook. (Note: Kelly is running for the U.S. Senate in Arizona with so much cash he is constantly in TV ads.) Read it and you can tell the whole thing was drafted and posted by them.
 
Joe Biden had nothing to do with it, he can't even know everything that's in it. His "people" simply granted access and permission to list whatever they wanted. Don't believe that? Have any reporter ask him about it. He won't be able to answer. I know, it's an easy bet to win. No reporter will ask. Ever. Right. The fix is in. So, look!
 
Go take a look yourself, see if you agree, the link is below. You can read. "Be" the reporter. Every anti-gun everything I've ever seen, except this one below about banning gun teaching, it's new. I could not believe it when I saw it, it knocked me flat.
 
Gun education is banned --

 

"Prohibit the use of federal funds to arm or train educators to discharge firearms. We should be passing rational gun laws, not requiring educators who already have too much on their plates to also protect the safety of their students. Biden supports barring states from using federal dollars to arm or train educators to discharge firearms."

 
That's enough for now.
I've run too long.
 
I've deconstructed the bill for myself to understand it
I'll clean that up and and lay it out here.
Don't be lazy. Go take a look at the bill. Get shocked enough to spread the word.
If the White House changes hands, gun rights and the guns you already own go with that.
 
See you later.

WHY Do You Support Background Checks?

Questions the kids haven’t had to answer
 
“The left is not in an all-out war against the Second Amendment,” say the people on the left who are in an all-out war against the right to keep and bear arms. “We’re not trying to take away all the guns. We understand you think this way, but it’s based upon a deception.”

No, it’s not. Read what retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens was granted space in The New York Times to say. Repeal the Second Amendment. Did democrats and the left attack him for this? No, they cheered. They paid for space to say it.

Socialists, politely called the left, are seeking to coalesce power into government hands. It’s what socialists have done since the communist manifesto was published. And they lie. They want all the guns. It’s the bottom line of the current debate, taken to its plain conclusion. Now they’ve got kids doing their bidding.

This is precisely why Americans are armed -- to resist this, with force, if necessary. Unfortunately, Americans have become so wealthy and comfortable, the cold-dead-fingers motto has become just a slogan, no longer a policy. The NRA needs to wise up to this. So do you.

The left is unconscionably promoting children who have taken up their cause in complete ignorance of facts. The kids’ fears are real all right. Their desire for a solution to mass-murdering psychos and jihadis is real enough. Everyone shares their desire for a solution to that. Stop their psychotically lethal classmates, they cry. Their emotions are enormously real, and motivational and contagious. The left is banking on this.

What is not real are the facts, logic and reasoning the kids are using, adopted in whole cloth from their left-wing puppeteers.

The same tired old rhetoric, which has been proven false time and again, the left has been spouting for decades -- ever since the feckless Brady bill appeared and is now reappearing in new forms.
 
You remember:
 
-- blood in the streets from carry permits!
 
-- invisible guns!
 
-- armed pilots shooting down their own planes!
 
-- 30-day cooling-off periods for abusers, now trusted with guns for 30 years!
 
-- Sit down for it:
 
-- educators (formerly teachers) will shoot themselves!
 
-- and their students!
 
-- and drop their guns
 
-- which will go off!
 
-- and forget them in bathrooms for kids to find!
 
-- and shoot each other because they know nothing!
 
-- And cops will shoot matronly old armed teachers
 
-- because they can’t distinguish them from armed psychotic kids with ARs!

-- if only they had to go through better background checks!

Who are these incompetent gunless boobs we’re paying to educate our kids? Teachers are incapable of handling firearms -- or even teaching about them in a historical context? Toothless NRA gun bubbas can handle firearms but teachers can’t? Say what? Who starts these rumors? How do these people get dressed each day without help.

The abject stupidity of the arguments -- with grade schoolers as ambassadors of irrational policy -- is plainly evident by questions the media has avoided asking, and answers the children and their adult instigators obviously couldn’t answer if asked.

The lack of curiosity points out the poverty of leftist positions the kids are carrying for mind masters, the lack of grounding, and the dangerous, freedom-choking socialist stench that is a death knell for The American Way.

That may be a big hoorah for socialism, but it is not what America needs. God help us if a band of activated kids whines, nags and cajoles adults in Congress to placate them with reckless bills from which we may never be able to extricate ourselves. A few youngsters and malfeasants in Congress are especially sympathetic to the ignorant whining and thus extra dangerous.

This is not gimme-a-dollar-for-an-ice-cream ma, to a kid who is already packing too many pounds. This is a wild kid with no focus who’s demanding keys to dad’s ’Vette and broke into the liquor cabinet.

Reporters, get woke --

Questions you should be asking but aren’t, of the nation’s child-active anti-gun-rights commandos:
 
When you say assault weapons, what do you mean exactly? Get answers.

What specifically would be subject to confiscation, banned from sale, and how is this constitutionally permissible? Note: Reporters should estimate quantities involved and property values for well-researched articles.

What should the public then be allowed to have?
 
Who in your opinion should decide what firearms the public can have, and how is that power delegated?
 
You seek to limit magazine capacity. How many rounds should a magazine have?
 
How did you arrive at that number?
 
Experts say having less ammunition is dangerous in an emergency. How do you respond?
 
Would police accept reduced-capacity magazines, and why or why not?
 
A key purpose of the Second Amendment is to provide a balance of power between the public and the government. Are you aware of that, and does that matter?
 
Do the police and the public have any parity of arms?
 
Have you read any of the bills adults have proposed in response to your demands?
 
If it turns out the bills, which have only been proposed by democrats, do not match your demands, a) would you still support them, and b) Would you feel like you were being used for influence, but not for your goals?
 
Should background checks include gun registration?
 
What’s the difference?
 
Background checks have played no part in stopping the ongoing Muslim jihad mass murders, which have targeted the LGBTQ community and so-called “infidels.” How will your plan affect that?
 
Why are children becoming psychotic and willing to mass murder their classmates, when they never used to, even though guns used to be more available than they are today?
 
Will background checks address that problem (suddenly sociopathic children)?
 
Do drug companies have a role in that, as critics charge, which everyone is sweeping under the rug?
 
Are you or have you ever taken psychoactive prescription drugs and if so which ones, on whose recommendation?
 
Would you be willing to be permanently banned from ever owning a firearm yourself, for your own safety or the safety of others? Why or why not? If you’re under age, would you be willing to have an adult sign for you?
 
Is there any difference between the M1 rifle millions of soldiers brought back with them from World War II and Korea and the AR-15 rifle you want to ban, besides the wood vs. polymer stock?
 
###
 
A version of this article appeared in American Handgunner in May, 2018.
A superb publication, worth your attention.

WHY BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE A LIE

Stopping psychos, and gun checks, are unrelated

Anti-gun-rights crusaders keep calling for new and improved background checks. You know why. They dance in the blood of victims, using tragedy to manipulate for their goals. It’s what they do. Bottom line, they don't want checks, they want all the guns.

The problem with the check scheme is that background checks are a lie. The crusaders’ big claim, constantly repeated on the old-news channels, is that the existing check has stopped about three million gun sales. What a glorious achievement. We need more of this, they say.

Not a single reporter in the entire profession has the brains, training or ethics to ask even the most obvious questions. This perpetuates the lie. Whether that’s deliberate, ignorance, stupidity, a plot, it doesn’t matter. What matters is it’s harmful. So I’ll ask.

Where are the three million arrests? Right?

It’s a serious crime to try to get guns if you legally can’t, you know that.

The check is designed to find criminals trying to buy guns at retail. The criminals banned are really bad dudes—bank robbers, rapists, murderers, fugitives, addicts, the mentally unstable, spousal abusers, jihadis, illegal aliens, there’s a federal list. It’s a long-term felony for these people to try.

What good is the background check if it finds these villains, has them right there in the store with the FBI on the phone for Pete’s sake, and we just turn them away? Do you know how much money we’re spending on this? Do we want to catch and lock up “the element” or not? We have their signatures on a form for proof. The background check is a lie.

But wait... are these people really guilty of anything? That’s one of the excuses the Brady supporters and authorities give (they have many) for not locking up virtually any of the desperados they identify: a positive hit in the system is insufficient grounds for dispatching an arresting unit. It’s not exactly court-quality evidence to press charges. Say what?

Put another way, those three million background-check “victims” experienced denial of their fundamental constitutional right to buy firearms by government clerks and a list. They could not confront their accuser, did not get a reason for the denial, and in significant numbers the denials were wrong. They were essentially convicted and denied their rights without a trial. Their due process was revoked. The background check is worse than a lie, it’s a travesty. For those three million denials, prosecutions are extremely rare, in low two digits annually, convictions are apparently not even routinely tracked.

Left-wingers dreamed this up, and got it enacted dancing in blood (they still do) back in the 1990s. It seemed to make sense, like many of their schemes, but in practice it is totally bogus. It destroys due process, plays find and release with criminals, can’t distinguish between the guilty and the innocent and wastes scarce funds. They don’t care, they just promote it like crazy, maybe because they are -- and it is. Reporters march along. Shame on my journalism profession for the harm they cause. "If the media reported accurately on guns the debate would end."

The BIDS system, the Blind ID System, performs a similar function, but it costs far less and doesn’t register gun owners by the tens of millions, like the current “NICS” system seems to. Gun-owner registration is the primary but unspoken goal of the current plan, another lie. When Janet Reno first built the thing in Clarksburg, W.Va., back in 1998, not only was it a registration system, in direct violation of the enabling statute’s ban on recording (18 USC §922 s&t), she had the audacity to announce that her $250 million computer could not erase records. There is no end to the hubris of bureaucrats and anti-gun-rights crusaders.

The FBI assures us none of the inbound gun-buyer data is stored in any way, but you can’t audit, and how much faith do you have in that? When I diagrammed the entire system for Gun Owners of America, (https://www.gunlaws.com/images/nicsbig.gif) it turned out NICS queries criminal databases in many lands (Scotland Yard, Mossad and Interpol, for example). There's no indication those search records are wiped.

In the BIDS system, instead of gathering millions of innocent people’s names, licensed dealers receive the names of the bad guys, like wanted posters, and they check it out in their stores. Simple, efficient, encoded, logged so you can’t check out your daughter’s boyfriend. We trust certified dealers to sell guns, we can trust them to look up their customers in a secure phone book.

BIDS might make sense. The send-me-your-name NICS registration scheme is hoax-like from the word go. But ever since the presidency changed, the nation has learned how much one side perpetually lies.

POSTSCRIPT: When it comes down to it, the gun-ban cheerleaders won't be happy until guns, "go away." But there is no "go away." They are guaranteed to remain dissatisfied, while we refuse to cooperate. Have the government take guns? You're only giving them to Mr. Trump, who gun grabbers think is a Nazi personified, so that's hopelessly irrational. Irrational. And even a wave-a-magic-wand disappearance method (or 100% effective bill) is nonsense, communist China would start imports worse than cocaine trafficking. South America too. All we face from the left on guns is mythtology and Utopianism that interferes with life.

###

A version of this article originally appeared in The Daily Caller.

Read what people are saying about Page Nine, or tell Alan yourself.

See the archives below, or click through to an index of Page Nine posts at Gunlaws.com

About the Author

  • Freelance writer Alan Korwin is a founder and past president of the Arizona Book Publishing Association. With his wife Cheryl he operates Bloomfield Press, the largest producer and distributor of gun-law books in the country. Here writing as "The Uninvited Ombudsman," Alan covers the day's stories as they ought to read. Read more.

Recent Comments

Read the last 100 comments on one handy page here!