Sign up to receive Alan's newsletter by email.

Speaking engagements

  • Invite Alan Korwin to speak at your event! Thought-provoking, entertaining, freedom-oriented topics -- your guests will thank you for the excitement -- long after the applause ends!


Black Lives Matter Is a Racist Fraud

Black Lives Matter Is a Racist Fraud

by Tom Patterson with Alan Korwin

Tom Patterson is a retired medical doctor, former Republican Majority Leader of the Arizona State Senate, and former Chairman of the Goldwater Institute. Alan Korwin, the author of 14 books, is the publisher at Bloomfield Press and has been writing as The Uninvited Ombudsman since 2006.


Black Lives Matter claims to be fighting for things it calls “social justice” or “black liberation” and “black sovereignty.” It’s conveniently unclear how anyone would know when those goals are met. Meanwhile, they do promise to “burn down the system” if they don’t achieve success. Some of these conflagrations are easily perceived.

Black Americans, no, Americans, already enjoy legal equality and civil rights protected by law. Polls reveal police are well regarded by 70% of minority community members. Charges of excessive black deaths at the hands of police have been debunked statistically time after time.

So what’s really going on here? Mass media certainly hasn’t illuminated the subject. The fact is: BLM was founded by proud Marxists with the avowed intent of spreading Marxist ideology. In a 2015 interview, co-founder Patrice Cullors broke the code, stating “myself and Alicia [Garza, another co-founder] in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists.” Nothing said or done since provide cause for doubt.

With media’s help, many well-intentioned Americans and the corporate class have bought into the false notion that BLM is a populist movement dedicated to combatting police brutality against blacks, and promoting the welfare of a black underclass. But Marxism is nothing of the sort—it is an ideology devoted to the destruction of democratic capitalism and the eventual triumph of a group-think dictatorship. Corporations funneling buckets of guilt tribute to the organization are financing their own destruction, vainly hoping as Neville Chamberlain did to appease the beast.

Like other totalitarian movements throughout history, BLM has never been that concerned with the plight of minorities or the public, though it may expediently profess to be. In fact, the liberals of Marx’s time were a major source of irritation to him—liberals here meaning those dedicated to Enlightenment values like reason, liberty and equality.

So now BLM starts to make sense. Totalitarians don’t tolerate criticism. Critics of BLM get attacked and lose their jobs, some for simply not showing adequate enthusiasm, or departing from the party line.

If black lives mattered to BLM, they now have the funding to do enormous good (blindly supplied by terrified or misguided and extorted donors on bended knee). They could establish community watch programs, create opportunities for black children with education initiatives like charter schools and provide rewards for the apprehension of the murderers of black children.

But that’s not their interest or style. Their street “protests“ inevitably degenerate into terrifying, demoralizing riots with looting and burning that couldn’t possibly benefit blacks. Erasing the nation’s past is in the Marxist playbook, flatly stated by communists and written into the Congressional Record on January 10, 1963. It was the heart and soul of the Cultural Revolution perpetrated by Mao in China, and now taking root here.

Death to religion, the family, art, culture, comfort and the rest. Statues reflecting our history and past are toppled, and American values are denigrated even though again they have nothing to do with helping today’s blacks or what matters. Manhattan is a boarded up wasteland hidden from you by the hopelessly corrupted “news” media.

Some of the BLM‘s stated goals are nominally concerned with actual black lives, but even these include such dated nonsense as “ending the war against black people.” That “war” put a black man in the White House (for two terms), made Oprah a multi billionaire, generated the Black Congressional Caucus which you better not decry as segregated, discriminatory and racist while calling for an equivalent white caucus.

Now BLM explicitly demands the dissolution of police and prisons. That’s not even rational. The level of extortion and excess is reflected by Congress, cowed into awkward silence. BLM wants a “radical and sustainable redistribution of wealth through the tax code.” In America, if you want money, you go out and earn it, like Oprah and all the other rich people of color and no color did. Redistributing people’s wealth—which is done by force at the point of a gun—is the corrupt communist way. We don’t do that here, hear?

Then there’s that left-wing totalitarian staple, the “disruption of the western-prescribed nuclear-family-structure requirement.” Now they’re treading on really dangerous ground. What’s next? Maoist style abortions or death to all female newborns? Eugenics to solve the fatherless birth problem in the “community”?

The BLM movement bears no resemblance to the Civil Rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, with its stunning progress and accomplishments. MLK’s followers believed their campaign was a moral witness that should be conducted with dignity. Protestors were non-violent, wouldn’t brook pillaging, arson and wanton destruction. They didn’t hate America like these malfeasants do.

No, they sought to be part of the dream in a fully realized way. Unlike today’s radicals, they faced real racism embedded in the institutions and laws of the time. But they followed their dreams with high ideals, a just cause and in the end proved profoundly effective. Democrats’ counterproductive war on poverty, dissolution of the family (which BLM still champions as a Marxist goal) continues to beleaguer full participation in America’s wealth creating engine. We’re not there yet.

BLM followers are the diametric opposite—sharing a core belief that America is irredeemably racist and therefore deserves destruction. America is not “a thing,” it is its people. These people, of every stripe, are the greatest force the planet has ever seen, for eliminating poverty and improving the human convention, and BLM only sees horror! Shelby Steele, a veteran of the civil-rights movement, points out that they have to search hard for signs of actual racism, instead resorting to complaints of “micro- aggressions” and “cultural appropriation” as well as endless hoaxes and myths. America, a work in progress, is among the most tolerant nations on Earth. Would BLMers prefer Nigeria, or Cuba, Russia or Venezuela? Make it so, buy a ticket to ride. They won’t. This is the promised land.

The bright future promised by the civil-rights movement and our Founding documents is materializing, slow and steady. But now it struggles against the twin toxins of black victimhood and white guilt, aggressively exploited by this new BLM—for the perverse advancement of Marxism, socialism, communism, and destruction of the greatest system of governance ever devised.

BLM isn’t here to help and heal. Everything it does serves to divide us and pit Americans against each other, in classic Marxist class-warfare style. By their own words, they are here to destroy us unless we bend to their intolerant tyrannical will. Stand firm America, let not the unholy forces of the dark side of human nature overtake the bright white light of all we have and will continue to accomplish in this, the greatest nation on God’s green Earth.

What Is a "natural born Citizen"?

Was it ever defined?

What was/is the definition?

Did the Founding Fathers know the definition?

Did they just throw that in without knowing what they were doing?

Is there a reason they used it? What was the reason?

Can the Constitution be changed without an Amendment?

(You know the answer to that)

Why do people who ask get called dirty names?


I know I promised to write up the Democrats gun-ban bill, HR 5717, but this has to come first.

All the fuss over Article II, 14A, “citizen,” "birthright citizen," and “natural born Citizen” is getting out of hand.

I have the gun-ban bill done, but questions are flooding in to me. Have to answer all at once.

This first. Then I have co-written articles about the BLM and race-baiting,

but the mess media won't let up on this --


Birther Is an “N” Word. 

It’s almost as bad as calling someone “a racist.”

Typically, the people who charge racism are the racists, did you ever notice that?

This is a way to avoid a discussion, to write off a person or topic as unworthy of debate.

Using a curse word to avoid using your brain is dishonest. It avoids knowledge, facts or logic.

Cursing you out is a cheap shot, a way to hide truth.

There is nothing “birther” about the U.S. Constitution, or Article II, or its requirement for the U.S. President to be not just a citizen but a “natural born Citizen” spelled that way in Article II with no hyphen and one capital letter.

Our Founding Fathers (yes, Fathers) put the nbC requirement in the Constitution for a reason, a critically important reason, and modern efforts to denigrate it, whitewash it, pretend it doesn’t exist or doesn’t mean what it really means are really about destroying America. Yes, it is that important. Anyone who says “birther!” about this is worse than someone who shouts the N word, because the "N" word is just racism. This is about the survival of freedom.

A lot of lies and distortions are being used to attack the Constitution right now. Leftists and unfortunately Democrats are the main culprits (but not the only ones). The whole concept of a natural born Citizen, or nbC is under attack, along with infringement of your right to arms and more. Some of these principles you know, they’re easy. NOTE: Be sure you're registered to vote, do it.

1. The Constitution can only be changed by Amendment. You know this. It cannot be changed by a statute from Congress. News media has been insisting otherwise, shame on them, they abandoned ethics long ago. It cannot be changed by a Supreme Court decision (though some decisions reinterpret it, sometimes badly).

2. The Constitution does not define “natural born Citizen”and while that’s true, anyone saying that seeks to deceive you, it’s a "tell," a dead giveaway.

The Constitution doesn’t define virtually any of its terms. You know that too: weights and measures; post roads, arms, infringed, the people, privileges, immunities, due process of law, free speech. the press, houses, papers, religion, assemble, none of it is defined. If you see “But the Constitution doesn’t define natural-born citizen!” you know you’re dealing with an evil bastage.

The Founders warned, when a question of definition arises, go back to the original meaning at the time the Constitution was written and use that.

3. Article II has never been amended.The process for amending the Constitution is in Article V. It has never been used to change Article II. The President must be a natural born Citizen, or the Constitution is violated, abrogated.

4. You also know this --The Founders used language carefully and with precision. They did not just jot things down without thought.  This is less widely known, and is now being obfuscated (obscured, blurred, confused, muddied, twisted): “natural born Citizen” was defined and well known when the Constitution was written. The definition of nbC, the only definition existing at the time, was in a book Ben Franklin brought to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, a process described in detail below.

A natural born Citizen is a person born on U.S. soil, to two U.S. citizens at the time of birth. There is no other way to gain this quality. Period.

Continue reading "What Is a "natural born Citizen"?" »

Kamala Harris Is Not Eligible

REMEMBER: Kamala Harris is not eligible to become President of the United States.

Neither of her parents were American citizens at the time of her birth. It’s like offering the children of any other foreigners as candidates. It is forbidden, banned, not allowed by the U.S. Constitution, which spells out the requirements.

A candidate, a valid candidate, must be a “natural born Citizen” per article Art. II, Sec. 1, cl. 5 of the U.S. Constitution: “No person, except a natural born Citizen,” shall be eligible to the Office of President. This is not about any past mistakes, or modern arguments -- of which there are many. It is about The U.S. Constitution and the rule of law. Kamala Harris is ineligible.

What Congress relied upon in drafting that section --

Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at § 212:

  • 212: The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

John Jay (first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) wrote to George Washington:

July 25, 1787

“Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

Modern media pundits and others are attempting to confuse the issue, but the reality and logic is plain and inescapable: only a 100% American can be President. How foreign is too foreign? Any. (Her mother was from India, her father was Jamaican, neither had been in the U.S. long enough (five years) to have become naturalized at the time of her birth.) Sorry, those are the facts. She may be nice, talented, experienced, she isn't qualified.

What would happen if our country got into a disagreement with a nation that was the homeland of a President with foreign roots, parents from elsewhere? Where would the person’s loyalty reside? Who would that person side with? Would the person have undivided loyalty to this country? Of course not -- the conflict would be monumental. India has nuclear weapons. Jamaica is close to our shores. Both have alliances with other nations, some less than friendly with us, and complex financial relationships, supply chains, citizens here. The Founding Fathers recognized the problem those foreign entanglements would cause. That split loyalty is why our Constitution requires the U.S. President must be 100% American.

Details, if you want more: We Elect An American President.htm

Black Lives Matter Is...

RACIST. Well it certainly is discriminatory.
What would you (and mess media) say about:
White Lives Matter? That's intolerant.
They can't even tolerate ALL LIVES MATTER.

And of course, all lives do not matter.
Elite lives matter. Just read the news.
I'm not telling you anything you don't already know.
I'm just sayin'.

Black Lives Matter violates the holy grail of diversity.

It promotes segregation -- of thought, principles, equal justice.
But the biggest issue is the one mess media sweeps under the rug:

Marxism is a direct enemy of America and YOUR freedom.

Marxism (you should know this) stands against religion, capitalism,
individual prosperity, property ownership, free thought, owning a business,
turning a profit, hiring staff, freedom itself. Dogma in place of free speech.
You see it everywhere in the BLM riots, thought control an cancel culture.

WARNING: You will not be part of the leadership.
You will be a subject.

Anyone who helps elect Biden actually gets
Pelosi, Schumer, Sanders, Ilhan Omar, AOC, BLM, Antifa,
George Soros, Anderson Cooper, Don Lemon, The Clintons again...
all the lefties we are hoping to leave behind come right back.
This is why leftist mayors are letting the Blacks run wild...
and the school-trained youngsters, and antifa-- can you believe it, antifa? --
they believe it will help them get elected.
Not all Blacks, just the ones TV is featuring.
It's an upside down world, isn't it.


They wouldn't be arguing so hard.
That's the whole problem in a nutshell.
"What you resist persists."

Black lives don't matter.
Everyone understands that.

7,000 blacks murder each other, every year, and even the blacks do nothing about it. The state sure doesn't. It perpetuates it.

It's not even a secret. There's even a map:

The so-called Black Lives Matter movement excuses it, says look the other way, that's not the point, ignores the problem, and focuses on one cop.

OK, two cops. And a redneck.

George Floyd had three times the lethal dose of fentanyl in him when he died.
Didn't you read the toxicology report? It's online.
Fentanyl stops your breathing.

Cop's knee was on his neck, not his throat.
Michael Brown never had his hands up.
Never said don't shoot. Everyone knows it.
Brown's blood was on the inside of the cop's squad-car door.
From trying to take the cop's gun away when he was shot.

It doesn't matter. Just like black lives.
I'm telling you true.

Democrats run the cities where black lives that matter not are constantly lost.

And Democrats convince blacks to simply keep voting them in power.
What's wrong with that picture? How dey do dat?

Ask cheerleader Al Sharpton.
Nah, he'll just bamboozle you again.
Ask Kanye West.

Colorless lives matter.
Everyone knows that too.

SAVE! Means Spend.

More proof Americans (not you of course) are stupider than Jupiter.

And Earth, by the way, takes a capital letter, it is not earth unless you mean dirt.

Start watching mess media with your eyes open, you'll see "earth" everywhere.

Envirowackos (and mess media) consistently misspell our planet, unlike mars or uranus.

No editing, no ombudsman, no ethics, no worries. What, me worry?

Don't worry. MAD magazine went belly up.

In the ongoing effort to dumb down the public, merchandise sales efforts now include impossible math, to an electorate that can't add, from a school system that doesn't teach them how. People who I won't name (not you honey, I swear) believe "Buy one get one for 50% off!" is a half price sale. It's a 25% discount, and it gets you to spend more. Do the math. Oh, that's right, most people can't. Hence the ad.

By now you have probably gotten wise to the scam of raising prices, then offering a discount, often to above the original price. That's illegal, but just like with gun law, you don't need law, you need law enforcement, and there is none. Look at Portland. Why aren't those people arrested, or worse? Democrats are proposing eliminating law enforcement, and have convinced people to vote for that. I say, don't.


1st Amendment faces risks as great as 2nd Amendment

4th, 5th, 6th and 10th Amendments also under assault

For years, only 2A folks payed attention

by Alan Korwin, “The Uninvited Ombudsman

An increasing number of Americans are becoming aware of an ignored “holiday,” formerly the purview mainly of gun activists and Second Amendment supporters—the day the Bill of Rights was ratified, Dec. 15, 1791.

Articles 3 through 12, proposed amendments to the then new U.S. Constitution, were renamed and became the U.S. Bill of Rights. A landmark in the record of human liberty, nothing like it had ever been attempted. It now faces threats as never before.

While gun rights previously took most of the heat, all civil rights are in more jeopardy in 2019. Gun-rights advocates promoted the date, because they saw Second Amendment guarantees of the right to arms as fundamental to protection of the rest. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership,, has vigorously promoted the date for decades, under a banner, of “All of the Bill of Rights for all citizens,” knowing gun rights were carried on its coattails.

Journalists, who as a group often disparage the Second Amendment and the armed populace it encourages, now face a torrent of anti-Bill of Rights sentiment and laws, largely from left-wing college students and professors, who believe free speech, which derives its nearly absolute powers from the First Amendment, falls out of favor. Along with it, the right to practice religion without government interference, and even the right to assemble, have come under withering scrutiny, including physical and moral attack. Varieties of “political correctness,” euphemisms for marxism/socialism are to blame, promoting fear, hatred, racism, intolerance, “required diversity,” offensiveness, narratives and group think as reasons to curtail free exchange of ideas and speech.

Pundits note that so-called “red-flag gun laws,” as well as current congressional efforts to impeach the U.S. president, rely heavily on removal of due process protections under the 4th through 6th Amendments. These include bedrocks of freedom such as innocence until guilt is proven, the ability to confront your accuser and compel witnesses to appear in your defense, and public trials by jury, all of which have been abrogated. Other guarantees of the Bill of Rights have been ignored, with no penalties—or even charges—brought against the perpetrators, one of the most glaring flaws in the Constitution—it provides no specific penalties for abuse of its terms, short of revolt.

Bill of Rights Day can be easily celebrated by simply reading The Bill of Rights, alone or with friends, privately or aloud in public:

Crowded Field of Dems for Prez -- NOT!

It's a total scam, media typically deceptive
These are publicity hounds vying for exposure

Most have no chance, everyone knows it, 15 milliseconds of fame
"We get bargaining power for government posts later, when we drop out,
throw our influence behind another candidate, in exchange for promises
of cabinet posts or ambassadorships. The whole system is corrupt,
but if you don't play, you don't get pay."


About this freshman congresswoman with a ten-syllable Three-Name Name.

This is almost like granting glory nicknames to syndicate criminals. Congresswoman Cortez doesn't deserve and certainly has not earned any of this. Cortez is an easier and more appropriate name than even a three-letter acronym her allies have bestowed on her and the media waves as a badge of honor. Who do they think she is, JFK? FDR? OMG.

WTF? Why would you hand over linguistic advantage to such low-level anti-American creeps willingly?

You know they take our language (see, The Politically Corrected Glossary, and use it against us (us being Americans with morals and principles). Don't do it.

Ms. "AOC" Cortez auditioned for her part as you may know, won the audition, and was then put in place by something called The Justice Democrats. Watch her gloat about winning the audition:

Learn about this pernicious new wrinkle in the political landscape The Justice Democrats. They are why Cortez is such an apparent moron, they picked someone who had no political understanding at all, so they could provide -- scripts.

Have you seen the video of her, stunned when she learns, on a roof-top garden, that food grows out of dirt? I'm not kidding. Watch that video, they picked a low level woman with big eyes and star power.

The Justice Democrats plans to attack other vulnerable dems, "primary them out" of their districts and replace them with similar puppets, to gain control of Congress and turn it totally left wing. No, it's not a conspiracy theory, it's an Alinskyesque plan. It is completely plausible. Watch those links even for a few moments to see the plain evidence and details about it.


The Self Defense Wall on Our Southern Border.

The media blames only one side for the delay in erecting The Wall.

Clearly both sides have dug in, right?
This is called journalism "ethics."

President Trump wants $5 billion to build it, knowing Pelosi and her team of democrats won't allow Congress to act. He gets to blame them, they get to blame him. Congress stalls.

When Hussein Obama wanted fifteen times as much -- $150 billion -- in cash -- to give away to muslim enemy leaders of Iran, he simply got it in cash (from somewhere, never disclosed as far as I'm aware) and flew it on palettes in unmarked planes at night to give to them.

That guy never even got charged with providing material support to a terrorist organization.

Riddle me this: Why can't we, in defense of ourselves, do the same?

Where are the reporters who should be asking those questions?

Nancy Pelosi lives behind A WALL.
It provides her with protection. Protection is a good thing.
She understands the purpose and value of a wall.

Barack Hussein Obama lives behind A WALL.
It provides him with protection. Protection is a good thing.
He understands the purpose and value of a wall.


Someone needs to tell president Trump to make this point.
The rich, elitist democrats fighting the protective wall for America
all have protective walls for themselves.
This borders on criminal malfeasance.

Americans will respond to this message, just like you did.

Read what people are saying about Page Nine, or tell Alan yourself.

See the archives below, or click through to an index of Page Nine posts at

About the Author

  • Freelance writer Alan Korwin is a founder and past president of the Arizona Book Publishing Association. With his wife Cheryl he operates Bloomfield Press, the largest producer and distributor of gun-law books in the country. Here writing as "The Uninvited Ombudsman," Alan covers the day's stories as they ought to read. Read more.

Recent Comments

Read the last 100 comments on one handy page here!